↓ Skip to main content

Physiological quality of dual-purpose wheat seeds from plants subjected to artificial defoliation

Overview of attention for article published in Ciência Rural, January 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
4 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Physiological quality of dual-purpose wheat seeds from plants subjected to artificial defoliation
Published in
Ciência Rural, January 2017
DOI 10.1590/0103-8478cr20151582
Authors

Giselle Regina Rodolfo, Clovis Arruda Souza, Cileide Maria Medeiros Coelho, Karla Katy Belizario

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 4 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 4 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unknown 4 100%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unknown 4 100%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 November 2016.
All research outputs
#20,355,479
of 22,903,988 outputs
Outputs from Ciência Rural
#997
of 1,953 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#355,337
of 420,462 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ciência Rural
#37
of 111 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,903,988 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,953 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.3. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 420,462 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 111 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.