↓ Skip to main content

Games in the environmental context and their strategic use for environmental education

Overview of attention for article published in Brazilian Journal of Biology, May 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
57 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Games in the environmental context and their strategic use for environmental education
Published in
Brazilian Journal of Biology, May 2015
DOI 10.1590/1519-6984.0413
Pubmed ID
Authors

MAA Branco, AR Weyermüller, EF Müller, GT Schneider, HM Hupffer, J Delgado, JB Mossman, Bez, TG Mendes

Abstract

<p>This article aims to present the productivity of the assumptions of Philosophical Hermeneutics (Gadamer, 1996) and his discovery of the logical, ontological and structural model of the game that takes place during the experience that is the basis of comprehension. Thus, digital games are proposed as manners, methods and ways to improve the understanding, interpretation and application of the concepts of Sustainability and Environmental Principles. The attraction of the game as a pedagogic space lays in the fact that it takes over and allows the player to internalize ecological sensitivity, something that happens during the play. Finally, the results show an augment on students' motivation, when using the game versus the traditional process.</p>.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 57 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 1 2%
Unknown 56 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 8 14%
Unspecified 6 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 11%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 5 9%
Student > Bachelor 5 9%
Other 13 23%
Unknown 14 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 11 19%
Unspecified 6 11%
Social Sciences 4 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 5%
Other 15 26%
Unknown 15 26%