You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Nutritional aspects related to endometriosis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Revista da Associação Médica Brasileira, December 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1590/1806-9282.61.06.519 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Gabriela Halpern, Eduardo Schor, Alexander Kopelman |
| Abstract |
This literature review analyzed the evidence on nutritional aspects related to the pathogenesis and progression of endometriosis. Diets deficient in nutrients result in changes in lipid metabolism, oxidative stress and promote epigenetic abnormalities, that may be involved in the genesis and progression of the disease. Foods rich in omega 3 with anti-inflammatory effects, supplementation with Nacetylcysteine, vitamin D and resveratrol, in addition to the increased consumption of fruits, vegetables (preferably organic) and whole grains exert a protective effect, reducing the risk of development and possible regression of disease. Dietary re-education seems to be a promising tool in the prevention and treatment of endometriosis. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 29% |
| Spain | 2 | 29% |
| Indonesia | 1 | 14% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 14% |
| France | 1 | 14% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 71% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 29% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 276 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 275 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 64 | 23% |
| Student > Master | 38 | 14% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 18 | 7% |
| Researcher | 18 | 7% |
| Other | 14 | 5% |
| Other | 35 | 13% |
| Unknown | 89 | 32% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 73 | 26% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 56 | 20% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 12 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 9 | 3% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 8 | 3% |
| Other | 16 | 6% |
| Unknown | 102 | 37% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 109. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 August 2022.
All research outputs
#384,936
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Revista da Associação Médica Brasileira
#4
of 1,105 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,177
of 395,418 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Revista da Associação Médica Brasileira
#1
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,105 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 395,418 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them