↓ Skip to main content

Health information systems and pesticide poisoning at Pernambuco

Overview of attention for article published in Revista Brasileira de Epidemiologia, September 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (78th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
66 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Health information systems and pesticide poisoning at Pernambuco
Published in
Revista Brasileira de Epidemiologia, September 2015
DOI 10.1590/1980-5497201500030012
Pubmed ID
Authors

Pedro Costa Cavalcanti de Albuquerque, Idê Gomes Dantas Gurgel, Aline do Monte Gurgel, Lia Giraldo da Silva Augusto, Marília Teixeira de Siqueira

Abstract

Understanding the epidemiologic profile of a particular disease is key to undertake health actions. To that end, information systems that present quality data help in the decision-making process and demonstrate the impact of the problems. To analyze the contribution of health information systems for the characterization of pesticide poisoning through SINAN, CEATOX and SIM in the State of Pernambuco. In this study, the completeness and consistency of the data were assessed, as well as the epidemiological profile of pesticide poisoning in Pernambuco in the period from 2008 to 2012, based on the following Health Information Systems: Center for Toxicological Assistance of Pernambuco (CEATOX), Notifiable Diseases Information System (SINAN) and Mortality Information System (SIM). The data revealed incompleteness and inconsistencies in information. Regarding the profile, females are more affected in the morbidity profile, and men have a higher mortality rate. Poisoning was more frequent in young adults with low educational level. With regard to the circumstances, most of the cases were suicide attempts, unique acute cases and not related to work. Despite suggesting underreporting, the data showed that persons engaged in agriculture are most commonly affected. The strengthening of these systems is necessary for the generation of consistent information that support health policies for the population groups involved.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 66 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 3 5%
Unknown 63 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 19 29%
Student > Bachelor 9 14%
Student > Postgraduate 7 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 9%
Researcher 5 8%
Other 14 21%
Unknown 6 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 15 23%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 15%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 11%
Social Sciences 6 9%
Engineering 4 6%
Other 14 21%
Unknown 10 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 April 2023.
All research outputs
#4,835,823
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Revista Brasileira de Epidemiologia
#55
of 417 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#56,483
of 276,791 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Revista Brasileira de Epidemiologia
#2
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 417 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 276,791 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 8 of them.