You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A vigilância e o monitoramento das principais doenças crônicas não transmissíveis no Brasil - Pesquisa Nacional de Saúde, 2013
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Revista Brasileira de Epidemiologia, December 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1590/1980-5497201500060002 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Deborah Carvalho Malta, Sheila Rizzato Stopa, Celia Landmann Szwarcwald, Nayara Lopes Gomes, Jarbas Barbosa Silva, Ademar Arthur Chioro dos Reis |
| Abstract |
To describe the major noncommunicable diseases (NCDs) in Brazil, according to the information collected from individuals aged 18 years or older. Data from the National Health Survey (PNS), 2013, a transversal population-based study, were used. The proportions of each NCD were calculated and presented according to sex, with a 95% confidence interval (95%CI), with the absolute values. Of the total respondents, 45.1% reported presenting at least one NCD. The region with the highest prevalence of NCDs was the South (52.1%). Hypertension showed the highest prevalence among NCDs, with 21.4%, followed by chronic back problem (18.5%), depression (7.6%), arthritis (6.4%), and diabetes (6.2%). The intense/very intense degree of limitation showed a higher prevalence of other mental illnesses (37.6%) and cerebrovascular accident (25.5%). The improvement of health services is essential for an effective response to the double burden of illness in the middle- and low-income countries. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 304 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 2 | <1% |
| Unknown | 302 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 88 | 29% |
| Student > Master | 30 | 10% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 18 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 18 | 6% |
| Professor | 13 | 4% |
| Other | 31 | 10% |
| Unknown | 106 | 35% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 65 | 21% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 47 | 15% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 14 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 10 | 3% |
| Sports and Recreations | 10 | 3% |
| Other | 44 | 14% |
| Unknown | 114 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 March 2023.
All research outputs
#8,261,140
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Revista Brasileira de Epidemiologia
#90
of 417 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#119,884
of 395,397 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Revista Brasileira de Epidemiologia
#2
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 417 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 395,397 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 8 of them.