↓ Skip to main content

A vigilância e o monitoramento das principais doenças crônicas não transmissíveis no Brasil - Pesquisa Nacional de Saúde, 2013

Overview of attention for article published in Revista Brasileira de Epidemiologia, December 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
58 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
253 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A vigilância e o monitoramento das principais doenças crônicas não transmissíveis no Brasil - Pesquisa Nacional de Saúde, 2013
Published in
Revista Brasileira de Epidemiologia, December 2015
DOI 10.1590/1980-5497201500060002
Pubmed ID
Authors

Deborah Carvalho Malta, Sheila Rizzato Stopa, Celia Landmann Szwarcwald, Nayara Lopes Gomes, Jarbas Barbosa Silva Júnior, Ademar Arthur Chioro dos Reis

Abstract

To describe the major noncommunicable diseases (NCDs) in Brazil, according to the information collected from individuals aged 18 years or older. Data from the National Health Survey (PNS), 2013, a transversal population-based study, were used. The proportions of each NCD were calculated and presented according to sex, with a 95% confidence interval (95%CI), with the absolute values. Of the total respondents, 45.1% reported presenting at least one NCD. The region with the highest prevalence of NCDs was the South (52.1%). Hypertension showed the highest prevalence among NCDs, with 21.4%, followed by chronic back problem (18.5%), depression (7.6%), arthritis (6.4%), and diabetes (6.2%). The intense/very intense degree of limitation showed a higher prevalence of other mental illnesses (37.6%) and cerebrovascular accident (25.5%). The improvement of health services is essential for an effective response to the double burden of illness in the middle- and low-income countries.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 253 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 2 <1%
Unknown 251 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 79 31%
Student > Master 28 11%
Student > Postgraduate 16 6%
Professor 14 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 14 6%
Other 27 11%
Unknown 75 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 59 23%
Medicine and Dentistry 43 17%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 13 5%
Sports and Recreations 9 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 3%
Other 38 15%
Unknown 83 33%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 March 2016.
All research outputs
#11,068,947
of 12,450,620 outputs
Outputs from Revista Brasileira de Epidemiologia
#123
of 148 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#227,190
of 271,047 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Revista Brasileira de Epidemiologia
#3
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,450,620 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 148 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.9. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 271,047 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.