You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Seven Reasons Why: A User’s Guide to Transparency and Reproducibility *
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Brazilian Political Science Review (Online), January 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1590/1981-3821201900020001 |
| Authors |
Dalson Figueiredo Filho, Rodrigo Lins, Amanda Domingos, Nicole Janz, Lucas Silva |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 26 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 9 | 35% |
| Netherlands | 2 | 8% |
| Australia | 1 | 4% |
| Germany | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 13 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 16 | 62% |
| Scientists | 7 | 27% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 8% |
| Unknown | 1 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 32 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 32 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Professor | 5 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 13% |
| Researcher | 4 | 13% |
| Other | 3 | 9% |
| Other | 3 | 9% |
| Unknown | 8 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 10 | 31% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 9% |
| Computer Science | 3 | 9% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 6% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 4 | 13% |
| Unknown | 8 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 39. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 March 2024.
All research outputs
#1,058,365
of 25,490,562 outputs
Outputs from Brazilian Political Science Review (Online)
#5
of 141 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,364
of 447,211 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Brazilian Political Science Review (Online)
#1
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,490,562 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 141 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 447,211 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.