You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Efeito da temperatura na cinética de secagem em leito de espuma e na degradação de antocianina em morango
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Brazilian Journal of Food Technology, January 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1590/1981-6723.22118 |
| Authors |
Wallaf Costa Vimercati, Leandro Levate Macedo, Cintia da Silva Araújo, Luciano José Quintão Teixeira, Sérgio Henriques Saraiva |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 13 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Professor | 2 | 15% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 6 | 46% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 23% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 8% |
| Psychology | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 8 | 62% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 May 2022.
All research outputs
#4,839,027
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Brazilian Journal of Food Technology
#18
of 206 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#102,138
of 446,429 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Brazilian Journal of Food Technology
#6
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 206 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 446,429 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.