↓ Skip to main content

Socioeconomic diversities and infant development at 6 to 9 months in a poverty area of São Paulo, Brazil

Overview of attention for article published in Trends in Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, August 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
17 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
101 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Socioeconomic diversities and infant development at 6 to 9 months in a poverty area of São Paulo, Brazil
Published in
Trends in Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, August 2018
DOI 10.1590/2237-6089-2017-0008
Pubmed ID
Authors

Patricia Tella, Luciane da Rosa Piccolo, Mayra Lemus Rangel, Luis Augusto Rohde, Guilherme Vanoni Polanczyk, Euripides Constantino Miguel, Sandra Josefina Ferraz Ellero Grisi, Bacy Fleitlich-Bilyk, Alexandre Archanjo Ferraro

Abstract

The effects of socioeconomic disparities on cognitive development tend to emerge early in infancy and to widen throughout childhood, and may perpetuate later in life. Although the study of how poverty affects early childhood has increased in the last 20 years, many of the effects remain largely unknown, especially during the first year of life. To investigate the influence of socioeconomic status (SES) and maternal education on infants' language, motor and cognitive development. The cognitive, language and motor skills of 444 infants aged 6 to 9 months selected from a poor neighborhood in São Paulo, Brazil, were evaluated using the Bayley Scales of Infant Development. A questionnaire on socioeconomic background was administered to the participants' families. A positive association was found between SES and infants' performance on language and motor scales. Additionally, higher maternal education was associated with higher language and cognitive scores. Our findings indicate that SES effects are detectable very early in infancy. This result has implications for the timing of both screening and intervention efforts to help children overcome the consequences of living in poverty.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 101 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 101 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 17 17%
Unspecified 6 6%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 6%
Researcher 5 5%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 5%
Other 23 23%
Unknown 39 39%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 16 16%
Medicine and Dentistry 11 11%
Social Sciences 6 6%
Psychology 6 6%
Unspecified 6 6%
Other 13 13%
Unknown 43 43%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 November 2018.
All research outputs
#16,053,755
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Trends in Psychiatry and Psychotherapy
#101
of 277 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#197,263
of 342,525 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Trends in Psychiatry and Psychotherapy
#3
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 277 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 342,525 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.