You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Importância do diagnóstico e tratamento da fenilcetonúria
|
---|---|
Published in |
Revista de Saúde Pública, August 2001
|
DOI | 10.1590/s0034-89102000000100016 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Nádia VM de Mira, Ursula M Lanfer Marquez |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 14 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Portugal | 1 | 7% |
Unknown | 13 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 6 | 43% |
Researcher | 2 | 14% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 7% |
Unknown | 5 | 36% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Linguistics | 2 | 14% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 14% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 14% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 7% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 7% |
Other | 1 | 7% |
Unknown | 5 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 November 2019.
All research outputs
#8,261,756
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Revista de Saúde Pública
#263
of 1,139 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,661
of 40,377 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Revista de Saúde Pública
#10
of 44 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,139 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 40,377 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 44 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.