You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Importância do diagnóstico e tratamento da fenilcetonúria
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Revista de Saúde Pública, February 2000
|
| DOI | 10.1590/s0034-89102000000100016 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Nádia VM de Mira, Ursula M Lanfer Marquez |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 14 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Portugal | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 13 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 43% |
| Researcher | 2 | 14% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 4 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Linguistics | 2 | 14% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 14% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 14% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 7% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 7% |
| Other | 2 | 14% |
| Unknown | 4 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 November 2019.
All research outputs
#7,238,726
of 22,875,477 outputs
Outputs from Revista de Saúde Pública
#220
of 1,023 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,489
of 108,791 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Revista de Saúde Pública
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,875,477 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,023 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 108,791 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them