↓ Skip to main content

Effects of different polishing techniques on the surface roughness of dental porcelains

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Applied Oral Science, March 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (68th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Readers on

mendeley
71 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Effects of different polishing techniques on the surface roughness of dental porcelains
Published in
Journal of Applied Oral Science, March 2010
DOI 10.1590/s1678-77572010000100004
Pubmed ID
Authors

Işil SARIKAYA, Ahmet Umut GÜLER

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 71 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 71 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 13 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 17%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 7%
Student > Bachelor 4 6%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 4%
Other 10 14%
Unknown 24 34%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 37 52%
Materials Science 4 6%
Unspecified 2 3%
Engineering 2 3%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 1%
Other 1 1%
Unknown 24 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 August 2014.
All research outputs
#6,754,661
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Applied Oral Science
#66
of 596 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,009
of 103,307 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Applied Oral Science
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 596 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 103,307 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.