You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Effects of different polishing techniques on the surface roughness of dental porcelains
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Applied Oral Science, March 2010
|
DOI | 10.1590/s1678-77572010000100004 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Işil SARIKAYA, Ahmet Umut GÜLER |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 71 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 71 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 13 | 18% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 17% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 7% |
Student > Bachelor | 4 | 6% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 3 | 4% |
Other | 10 | 14% |
Unknown | 24 | 34% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 37 | 52% |
Materials Science | 4 | 6% |
Unspecified | 2 | 3% |
Engineering | 2 | 3% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 1% |
Other | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 24 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 August 2014.
All research outputs
#6,754,661
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Applied Oral Science
#66
of 596 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,009
of 103,307 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Applied Oral Science
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 596 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 103,307 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.