↓ Skip to main content

Prevention of shoulder injuries in overhead athletes: a science-based approach

Overview of attention for article published in Brazilian Journal of Physical Therapy, October 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#29 of 694)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
twitter
37 X users
facebook
7 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
133 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
1021 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Prevention of shoulder injuries in overhead athletes: a science-based approach
Published in
Brazilian Journal of Physical Therapy, October 2015
DOI 10.1590/bjpt-rbf.2014.0109
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ann M. Cools, Fredrik R. Johansson, Dorien Borms, Annelies Maenhout

Abstract

The shoulder is at high risk for injury during overhead sports, in particular in throwing or hitting activities, such as baseball, tennis, handball, and volleyball. In order to create a scientific basis for the prevention of recurrent injuries in overhead athletes, four steps need to be undertaken: (1) risk factors for injury and re-injury need to be defined; (2) established risk factors may be used as return-to-play criteria, with cut-off values based on normative databases; (3) these variables need to be measured using reliable, valid assessment tools and procedures; and (4) preventative training programs need to be designed and implemented into the training program of the athlete in order to prevent re-injury. In general, three risk factors have been defined that may form the basis for recommendations for the prevention of recurrent injury and return to play after injury: glenohumeral internal-rotation deficit (GIRD); rotator cuff strength, in particular the strength of the external rotators; and scapular dyskinesis, in particular scapular position and strength.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 37 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,021 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Unknown 1018 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 201 20%
Student > Bachelor 201 20%
Student > Postgraduate 60 6%
Other 55 5%
Student > Ph. D. Student 54 5%
Other 158 15%
Unknown 292 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Sports and Recreations 248 24%
Nursing and Health Professions 193 19%
Medicine and Dentistry 186 18%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 15 1%
Social Sciences 10 <1%
Other 52 5%
Unknown 317 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 43. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 October 2023.
All research outputs
#896,527
of 24,088,270 outputs
Outputs from Brazilian Journal of Physical Therapy
#29
of 694 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,456
of 279,296 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Brazilian Journal of Physical Therapy
#1
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,088,270 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 694 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 279,296 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them