↓ Skip to main content

Consensus statement on thoracic radiology terminology in Portuguese used in Brazil and in Portugal

Overview of attention for article published in Jornal de Pneumologia, October 2021
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
21 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Consensus statement on thoracic radiology terminology in Portuguese used in Brazil and in Portugal
Published in
Jornal de Pneumologia, October 2021
DOI 10.36416/1806-3756/e20200595
Pubmed ID
Authors

Bruno Hochhegger, Edson Marchiori, Rosana Rodrigues, Alexandre Mançano, Dany Jasinowodolinski, Rodrigo Caruso Chate, Arthur Soares Souza, Alexandre Marchini Silva, Márcio Sawamura, Marcelo Furnari, Cesar Araujo-Neto, Dante Escuissato, Rogerio Pinetti, Luiz Felipe Nobre, Danny Warszawiak, Gilberto Szarf, Gustavo Borges da Silva Telles, Gustavo Meirelles, Pablo Rydz Santana, Viviane Antunes, Julia Capobianco, Israel Missrie, Luciana Volpon Soares Souza, Marcel Koenigkam Santos, Klaus Irion, Isabel Duarte, Rosana Santos, Erique Pinto, Diana Penha

Abstract

Effective communication among members of medical teams is an important factor for early and appropriate diagnosis. The terminology used in radiology reports appears in this context as an important link between radiologists and other members of the medical team. Therefore, heterogeneity in the use of terms in reports is an important but little discussed issue. This article is the result of an extensive review of nomenclature in thoracic radiology, including for the first time terms used in X-rays, CT, and MRI, conducted by radiologists from Brazil and Portugal. The objective of this review of medical terminology was to create a standardized language for medical professionals and multidisciplinary teams.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 21 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 21 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 4 19%
Researcher 3 14%
Student > Master 3 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 5%
Lecturer 1 5%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 9 43%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 9 43%
Neuroscience 1 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 5%
Unknown 10 48%