↓ Skip to main content

Analysis and Purification of Mouse Intestinal Dendritic Cell and Macrophage Subsets by Flow Cytometry

Overview of attention for article published in Current protocols in immunology, August 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
49 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Analysis and Purification of Mouse Intestinal Dendritic Cell and Macrophage Subsets by Flow Cytometry
Published in
Current protocols in immunology, August 2016
DOI 10.1002/cpim.11
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

The unit presents a method for analysis of intestinal dendritic cell (DC) and macrophage subsets by flow cytometry in the single cell suspension prepared from the mouse small and large intestine (Basic Protocol). describes a strategy to enrich the hematopoietic cell fraction in the sample by Percoll gradient centrifugation, and describes preparation of single cell suspensions from specific tissue layers of the small intestine, such as the epithelium, villi mucosa, submucosa, and muscularis externa. Finally, Support Protocol explains how to purify specific intestinal DC and macrophage subsets by flow-cytometry-based cell sorting. © 2016 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 49 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Chile 1 2%
Unknown 48 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 12 24%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 10%
Student > Master 4 8%
Lecturer 2 4%
Other 3 6%
Unknown 18 37%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Immunology and Microbiology 10 20%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 16%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 12%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 8%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 4%
Other 2 4%
Unknown 17 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 August 2016.
All research outputs
#31,179,597
of 34,358,242 outputs
Outputs from Current protocols in immunology
#325
of 344 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#298,511
of 335,208 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current protocols in immunology
#3
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,358,242 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 344 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.7. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 335,208 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.