↓ Skip to main content

New Directions in the Study of Institutional Logics: From Tools to Phenomena

Overview of attention for article published in Annual Review of Sociology, May 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (55th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
17 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
77 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
201 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
New Directions in the Study of Institutional Logics: From Tools to Phenomena
Published in
Annual Review of Sociology, May 2021
DOI 10.1146/annurev-soc-090320-111734
Authors

Michael Lounsbury, Christopher W.J. Steele, Milo Shaoqing Wang, Madeline Toubiana

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 201 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 201 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 52 26%
Student > Doctoral Student 25 12%
Researcher 14 7%
Student > Master 14 7%
Professor 11 5%
Other 34 17%
Unknown 51 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Business, Management and Accounting 75 37%
Social Sciences 40 20%
Engineering 5 2%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 5 2%
Arts and Humanities 3 1%
Other 14 7%
Unknown 59 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 August 2022.
All research outputs
#2,763,681
of 25,791,949 outputs
Outputs from Annual Review of Sociology
#312
of 807 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#68,166
of 456,734 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annual Review of Sociology
#9
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,791,949 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 807 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 456,734 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.