You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
New Directions in the Study of Institutional Logics: From Tools to Phenomena
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Annual Review of Sociology, May 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1146/annurev-soc-090320-111734 |
| Authors |
Michael Lounsbury, Christopher W.J. Steele, Milo Shaoqing Wang, Madeline Toubiana |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 13% |
| Korea, Republic of | 1 | 6% |
| Canada | 1 | 6% |
| Germany | 1 | 6% |
| United States | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 10 | 63% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 9 | 56% |
| Scientists | 7 | 44% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 203 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 203 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 53 | 26% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 23 | 11% |
| Researcher | 14 | 7% |
| Student > Master | 14 | 7% |
| Professor | 12 | 6% |
| Other | 35 | 17% |
| Unknown | 52 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Business, Management and Accounting | 74 | 36% |
| Social Sciences | 40 | 20% |
| Engineering | 5 | 2% |
| Unspecified | 5 | 2% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 4 | 2% |
| Other | 16 | 8% |
| Unknown | 59 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 August 2022.
All research outputs
#2,858,819
of 25,827,956 outputs
Outputs from Annual Review of Sociology
#320
of 809 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#70,474
of 456,863 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annual Review of Sociology
#11
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,827,956 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 809 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 456,863 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.