↓ Skip to main content

ほうれんそうのゆで調理におけるシュウ酸含量の変化と中学校家庭科教材への活用

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Home Economics of Japan, January 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
ほうれんそうのゆで調理におけるシュウ酸含量の変化と中学校家庭科教材への活用
Published in
Journal of Home Economics of Japan, January 2015
DOI 10.11428/jhej.65.339
Authors

西川 和孝, 川本 実穂, 田中 章江

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 July 2021.
All research outputs
#17,637,892
of 25,852,155 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Home Economics of Japan
#116
of 241 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#222,959
of 361,819 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Home Economics of Japan
#4
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,852,155 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 241 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 361,819 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.