You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
The Malthusian–Darwinian dynamic and the trajectory of civilization
|
---|---|
Published in |
Trends in Ecology & Evolution, January 2013
|
DOI | 10.1016/j.tree.2012.12.001 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Jeffrey C. Nekola, Craig D. Allen, James H. Brown, Joseph R. Burger, Ana D. Davidson, Trevor S. Fristoe, Marcus J. Hamilton, Sean T. Hammond, Astrid Kodric-Brown, Norman Mercado-Silva, Jordan G. Okie |
Abstract |
Two interacting forces influence all populations: the Malthusian dynamic of exponential growth until resource limits are reached, and the Darwinian dynamic of innovation and adaptation to circumvent these limits through biological and/or cultural evolution. The specific manifestations of these forces in modern human society provide an important context for determining how humans can establish a sustainable relationship with the finite Earth. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 22 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 4 | 18% |
Italy | 2 | 9% |
United States | 2 | 9% |
Spain | 1 | 5% |
Mexico | 1 | 5% |
Canada | 1 | 5% |
Brazil | 1 | 5% |
Sweden | 1 | 5% |
Australia | 1 | 5% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 8 | 36% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 13 | 59% |
Scientists | 7 | 32% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 9% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 272 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Brazil | 14 | 5% |
United States | 5 | 2% |
Mexico | 4 | 1% |
Australia | 3 | 1% |
Germany | 3 | 1% |
Austria | 2 | <1% |
Canada | 2 | <1% |
South Africa | 1 | <1% |
United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
Other | 3 | 1% |
Unknown | 234 | 86% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 65 | 24% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 49 | 18% |
Student > Master | 33 | 12% |
Student > Bachelor | 25 | 9% |
Other | 22 | 8% |
Other | 51 | 19% |
Unknown | 27 | 10% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 141 | 52% |
Environmental Science | 52 | 19% |
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 13 | 5% |
Social Sciences | 7 | 3% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 5 | 2% |
Other | 18 | 7% |
Unknown | 36 | 13% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 July 2021.
All research outputs
#1,826,423
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Trends in Ecology & Evolution
#1,045
of 3,201 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,579
of 288,943 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Trends in Ecology & Evolution
#9
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,201 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 31.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 288,943 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.