↓ Skip to main content

International Center-Level Variation in Utilization of Completion Lymph Node Dissection and Adjuvant Systemic Therapy for Sentinel Lymph Node-Positive Melanoma at Major Referral Centers

Overview of attention for article published in Annals of Surgery, April 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
9 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
27 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
5 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
International Center-Level Variation in Utilization of Completion Lymph Node Dissection and Adjuvant Systemic Therapy for Sentinel Lymph Node-Positive Melanoma at Major Referral Centers
Published in
Annals of Surgery, April 2023
DOI 10.1097/sla.0000000000005370
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kristy K. Broman, Tasha M. Hughes, Brooke C. Bredbeck, James Sun, Dennis Kirichenko, Michael J. Carr, Avinash Sharma, Edmund K. Bartlett, Amanda A.G. Nijhuis, John F. Thompson, Tina J. Hieken, Lisa Kottschade, Jennifer Downs, David E. Gyorki, Emma Stahlie, Alexander van Akkooi, David W. Ollila, Kristin O’shea, Yun Song, Giorgos Karakousis, Marc Moncrieff, Jenny Nobes, John Vetto, Dale Han, Meghan Hotz, Jeffrey M. Farma, Jeremiah L. Deneve, Martin D. Fleming, Matthew Perez, Kirsten Baecher, Michael Lowe, Roger Olofsson Bagge, Jan Mattsson, Ann Y. Lee, Russell S. Berman, Harvey Chai, Hidde M. Kroon, Juri Teras, Roland M. Teras, Norma E. Farrow, Georgia M. Beasley, Jane Yuet Ching Hui, Lukas Been, Schelto Kruijff, Brandy Sinco, Amod A. Sarnaik, Vernon K. Sondak, Jonathan S. Zager, Lesly A. Dossett, for the International High Risk Melanoma Consortium

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 27 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 5 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 5 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor 1 20%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 20%
Student > Master 1 20%
Unknown 2 40%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 2 40%
Unknown 3 60%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 86. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 March 2022.
All research outputs
#494,161
of 25,394,764 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Surgery
#227
of 9,051 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,114
of 420,445 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Surgery
#3
of 76 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,394,764 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,051 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 420,445 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 76 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.