You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Twitter Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
International Center-Level Variation in Utilization of Completion Lymph Node Dissection and Adjuvant Systemic Therapy for Sentinel Lymph Node-Positive Melanoma at Major Referral Centers
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Annals of Surgery, April 2023
|
| DOI | 10.1097/sla.0000000000005370 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Kristy K. Broman, Tasha M. Hughes, Brooke C. Bredbeck, James Sun, Dennis Kirichenko, Michael J. Carr, Avinash Sharma, Edmund K. Bartlett, Amanda A.G. Nijhuis, John F. Thompson, Tina J. Hieken, Lisa Kottschade, Jennifer Downs, David E. Gyorki, Emma Stahlie, Alexander van Akkooi, David W. Ollila, Kristin O’shea, Yun Song, Giorgos Karakousis, Marc Moncrieff, Jenny Nobes, John Vetto, Dale Han, Meghan Hotz, Jeffrey M. Farma, Jeremiah L. Deneve, Martin D. Fleming, Matthew Perez, Kirsten Baecher, Michael Lowe, Roger Olofsson Bagge, Jan Mattsson, Ann Y. Lee, Russell S. Berman, Harvey Chai, Hidde M. Kroon, Juri Teras, Roland M. Teras, Norma E. Farrow, Georgia M. Beasley, Jane Yuet Ching Hui, Lukas Been, Schelto Kruijff, Brandy Sinco, Amod A. Sarnaik, Vernon K. Sondak, Jonathan S. Zager, Lesly A. Dossett |
Twitter Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 28 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 17 | 61% |
| Australia | 2 | 7% |
| Sweden | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 8 | 29% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 12 | 43% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 8 | 29% |
| Scientists | 7 | 25% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 3 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 3 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 1 | 33% |
| Professor | 1 | 33% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 1 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 1 | 33% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 91. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 March 2022.
All research outputs
#412,252
of 23,504,791 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Surgery
#202
of 8,674 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,290
of 220,632 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Surgery
#2
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,504,791 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,674 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 220,632 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.