↓ Skip to main content

Host cytoskeleton in respiratory syncytial virus assembly and budding

Overview of attention for article published in Virology Journal, September 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
reddit
2 Redditors

Readers on

mendeley
132 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Host cytoskeleton in respiratory syncytial virus assembly and budding
Published in
Virology Journal, September 2016
DOI 10.1186/s12985-016-0618-z
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) is one of the major pathogens responsible for lower respiratory tract infections (LRTI) in young children, the elderly, and the immunosuppressed. Currently, there are no antiviral drugs or vaccines available that effectively target RSV infections, proving a significant challenge in regards to prevention and treatment. An in-depth understanding of the host-virus interactions that underlie assembly and budding would inform new targets for antiviral development.Current research suggests that the polymerised form of actin, the filamentous or F-actin, plays a role in RSV assembly and budding. Treatment with cytochalasin D, which disrupts F-actin, has been shown to inhibit virus release. In addition, the actin cytoskeleton has been shown to interact with the RSV matrix (M) protein, which plays a central role in RSV assembly. For this reason, the interaction between these two components is hypothesised to facilitate the movement of viral components in the cytoplasm and to the budding site. Despite increases in our knowledge of RSV assembly and budding, M-actin interactions are not well understood. In this review, we discuss the current literature on the role of actin cytoskeleton during assembly and budding of RSV with the aim to integrate disparate studies to build a hypothetical model of the various molecular interactions between actin and RSV M protein that facilitate RSV assembly and budding.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 132 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 132 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 15%
Student > Master 18 14%
Student > Bachelor 15 11%
Researcher 10 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 5%
Other 12 9%
Unknown 50 38%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 22 17%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 20 15%
Immunology and Microbiology 14 11%
Chemistry 5 4%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 3%
Other 12 9%
Unknown 55 42%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 April 2023.
All research outputs
#22,929,732
of 32,237,790 outputs
Outputs from Virology Journal
#2,781
of 3,961 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#218,952
of 324,722 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Virology Journal
#29
of 44 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 32,237,790 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,961 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.3. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 324,722 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 44 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.