↓ Skip to main content

「理論」の構築過程に基づく学習指導による粒子概念の変容に関する研究―小学3・4年生を対象とした6単元に渡る継続調査を通して―

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Science Education in Japan, February 2019
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
「理論」の構築過程に基づく学習指導による粒子概念の変容に関する研究―小学3・4年生を対象とした6単元に渡る継続調査を通して―
Published in
Journal of Science Education in Japan, February 2019
DOI 10.14935/jssej.42.279
Authors

川崎 弘作, 中山 貴司

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 February 2022.
All research outputs
#17,637,892
of 25,852,155 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Science Education in Japan
#47
of 89 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#286,055
of 450,537 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Science Education in Japan
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,852,155 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 89 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 450,537 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.