You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Informed or misinformed consent and use of modified texture diets in dysphagia
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Medical Ethics, February 2023
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12910-023-00885-1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Shaun T. O’Keeffe, Paula Leslie, Tracy Lazenby-Paterson, Arlene McCurtin, Lindsey Collins, Aoife Murray, Alison Smith, Siofra Mulkerrin |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 81 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 39 | 48% |
| Ireland | 7 | 9% |
| United States | 3 | 4% |
| Australia | 2 | 2% |
| Costa Rica | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 29 | 36% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 55 | 68% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 22 | 27% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 2% |
| Scientists | 2 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 41 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 41 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 4 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 7% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 7% |
| Lecturer > Senior Lecturer | 2 | 5% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 3 | 7% |
| Unknown | 24 | 59% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 9 | 22% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 10% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 2% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 24 | 59% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 61. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 April 2024.
All research outputs
#714,018
of 25,706,302 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Ethics
#42
of 1,116 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,054
of 477,670 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Ethics
#2
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,706,302 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,116 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 477,670 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.