↓ Skip to main content

Informed or misinformed consent and use of modified texture diets in dysphagia

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medical Ethics, February 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#42 of 1,116)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
81 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
45 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Informed or misinformed consent and use of modified texture diets in dysphagia
Published in
BMC Medical Ethics, February 2023
DOI 10.1186/s12910-023-00885-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Shaun T. O’Keeffe, Paula Leslie, Tracy Lazenby-Paterson, Arlene McCurtin, Lindsey Collins, Aoife Murray, Alison Smith, Siofra Mulkerrin

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 81 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 45 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 45 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 4 9%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 3 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 7%
Student > Master 3 7%
Student > Bachelor 3 7%
Other 5 11%
Unknown 24 53%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 12 27%
Social Sciences 4 9%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 2%
Neuroscience 1 2%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 24 53%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 61. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 April 2024.
All research outputs
#714,018
of 25,706,302 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Ethics
#42
of 1,116 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,054
of 477,670 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Ethics
#2
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,706,302 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,116 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 477,670 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.