You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Lack of Sample Diversity in Research on Adolescent Depression and Social Media Use: A Scoping Review and Meta-Analysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Clinical Psychological Science, February 2023
|
| DOI | 10.1177/21677026221114859 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sakshi Ghai, Luisa Fassi, Faisal Awadh, Amy Orben |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 68 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 17 | 25% |
| United States | 9 | 13% |
| Canada | 3 | 4% |
| Australia | 2 | 3% |
| China | 1 | 1% |
| Sweden | 1 | 1% |
| Brazil | 1 | 1% |
| Hong Kong | 1 | 1% |
| Georgia | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 4 | 6% |
| Unknown | 28 | 41% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 36 | 53% |
| Members of the public | 31 | 46% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 29 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 29 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 4 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 14% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 2 | 7% |
| Lecturer | 1 | 3% |
| Lecturer > Senior Lecturer | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 2 | 7% |
| Unknown | 15 | 52% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 9 | 31% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 1 | 3% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 3% |
| Social Sciences | 1 | 3% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 16 | 55% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 86. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 March 2024.
All research outputs
#499,860
of 25,543,275 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Psychological Science
#83
of 867 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,508
of 475,552 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Psychological Science
#2
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,543,275 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 867 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 49.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 475,552 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.