You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Lack of Sample Diversity in Research on Adolescent Depression and Social Media Use: A Scoping Review and Meta-Analysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Clinical Psychological Science, February 2023
|
| DOI | 10.1177/21677026221114859 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sakshi Ghai, Luisa Fassi, Faisal Awadh, Amy Orben |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 69 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 17 | 25% |
| United States | 9 | 13% |
| Australia | 2 | 3% |
| France | 1 | 1% |
| China | 1 | 1% |
| Georgia | 1 | 1% |
| Chile | 1 | 1% |
| Sweden | 1 | 1% |
| Brazil | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 5 | 7% |
| Unknown | 30 | 43% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 37 | 54% |
| Members of the public | 31 | 45% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 33 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 33 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 5 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 12% |
| Unspecified | 3 | 9% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 2 | 6% |
| Lecturer | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 3 | 9% |
| Unknown | 15 | 45% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 9 | 27% |
| Unspecified | 4 | 12% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 1 | 3% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 3% |
| Social Sciences | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 16 | 48% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 87. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 March 2024.
All research outputs
#507,282
of 25,965,655 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Psychological Science
#83
of 875 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,693
of 480,887 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Psychological Science
#2
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,965,655 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 875 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 49.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 480,887 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.