You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Candidate cave entrances on Mars
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Caves & Karst Studies, April 2012
|
DOI | 10.4311/2010ex0167r |
Authors |
Glen Cushing |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 76 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 76 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 19 | 25% |
Student > Master | 16 | 21% |
Student > Bachelor | 10 | 13% |
Researcher | 7 | 9% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 7% |
Other | 8 | 11% |
Unknown | 11 | 14% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 32 | 42% |
Engineering | 8 | 11% |
Physics and Astronomy | 7 | 9% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 5% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 2 | 3% |
Other | 8 | 11% |
Unknown | 15 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2015.
All research outputs
#8,537,346
of 25,377,790 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Caves & Karst Studies
#5
of 33 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#59,171
of 175,010 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Caves & Karst Studies
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,377,790 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 33 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one scored the same or higher as 28 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 175,010 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them