You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Comparison of Modified Manual Acid-Phenol Chloroform Method and Commercial RNA Extraction Kits for Resource Limited Laboratories
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
International journal of clinical practice, June 2023
|
| DOI | 10.1155/2023/9593796 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Samuel Asamoah Sakyi, Alfred Effah, Emmanuel Naturinda, Ebenezer Senu, Stephen Opoku, Benjamin Amoani, Samuel Kekeli Agordzo, Oscar Simon Olympio Mensah, James Grant, Elizabeth Abban, Tonnies Abeku Buckman, Alexander Kwarteng, Richard K. Dadzie Ephraim, Kwabena Owusu Danquah |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Ghana | 3 | 30% |
| Uganda | 1 | 10% |
| Unknown | 6 | 60% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 7 | 70% |
| Scientists | 3 | 30% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 6 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 6 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Lecturer | 1 | 17% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 17% |
| Lecturer > Senior Lecturer | 1 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 2 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Immunology and Microbiology | 2 | 33% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 17% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 2 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 April 2024.
All research outputs
#4,141,223
of 25,658,541 outputs
Outputs from International journal of clinical practice
#414
of 2,563 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#70,111
of 386,735 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International journal of clinical practice
#2
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,658,541 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,563 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 386,735 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.