↓ Skip to main content

Comparison of Modified Manual Acid-Phenol Chloroform Method and Commercial RNA Extraction Kits for Resource Limited Laboratories

Overview of attention for article published in International journal of clinical practice, June 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (78th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
9 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
5 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Comparison of Modified Manual Acid-Phenol Chloroform Method and Commercial RNA Extraction Kits for Resource Limited Laboratories
Published in
International journal of clinical practice, June 2023
DOI 10.1155/2023/9593796
Pubmed ID
Authors

Samuel Asamoah Sakyi, Alfred Effah, Emmanuel Naturinda, Ebenezer Senu, Stephen Opoku, Benjamin Amoani, Samuel Kekeli Agordzo, Oscar Simon Olympio Mensah, James Grant, Elizabeth Abban, Tonnies Abeku Buckman, Alexander Kwarteng, Richard K. Dadzie Ephraim, Kwabena Owusu Danquah

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 5 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 5 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Lecturer 1 20%
Student > Master 1 20%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 20%
Unknown 2 40%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Immunology and Microbiology 2 40%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 20%
Unknown 2 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 July 2023.
All research outputs
#4,512,212
of 25,363,685 outputs
Outputs from International journal of clinical practice
#448
of 2,554 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#78,616
of 374,074 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International journal of clinical practice
#2
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,363,685 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,554 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 374,074 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.