You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Global, regional, and national prevalence and mortality burden of sickle cell disease, 2000–2021: a systematic analysis from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2021
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
The Lancet Haematology, June 2023
|
| DOI | 10.1016/s2352-3026(23)00118-7 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
GBD 2021 Sickle Cell Disease Collaborators, Azalea M Thomson, Theresa A McHugh, Assaf P Oron, Corey Teply, Nikhil Lonberg, Victor Vilchis Tella, Lauren B Wilner, Kia Fuller, Hailey Hagins, Richard Gyan Aboagye, Melka Biratu Aboye, Eman Abu-Gharbieh, Ahmed Abu-Zaid, Isaac Yeboah Addo, Bright Opoku Ahinkorah, Aqeel Ahmad, Saif Aldeen S AlRyalat, Hubert Amu, Aleksandr Y Aravkin, Judie Arulappan, Maha Moh'd Wahbi Atout, Ashish D Badiye, Sara Bagherieh, Maciej Banach, Morteza Banakar, Mainak Bardhan, Amadou Barrow, Deriba Abera Bedane, Isabela M Bensenor, Akshaya Srikanth Bhagavathula, Pankaj Bhardwaj, Prarthna V Bhardwaj, Ajay Nagesh Bhat, Zulfiqar A Bhutta, Mariah Malak Bilalaga, Jessica Devin Bishai, Saeid Bitaraf, Archith Boloor, Muhammad Hammad Butt, Vijay Kumar Chattu, Dinh-Toi Chu, Omid Dadras, Xiaochen Dai, Bardia Danaei, Anh Kim Dang, Fitsum Wolde Demisse, Meghnath Dhimal, Daniel Diaz, Shirin Djalalinia, Deepa Dongarwar, Muhammed Elhadi, Mohamed A Elmonem, Christopher Imokhuede Esezobor, Farshid Etaee, Oghenowede Eyawo, Adeniyi Francis Fagbamigbe, Ali Fatehizadeh, Lisa M Force, William M Gardner, Kazem Ghaffari, Paramjit Singh Gill, Mahaveer Golechha, Pouya Goleij, Vivek Kumar Gupta, Hamidreza Hasani, Treska S Hassan, Mohammed Bheser Hassen, Segun Emmanuel Ibitoye, Adalia I Ikiroma, Chidozie C D Iwu, Peter Bai James, Shubha Jayaram, Rime Jebai, Ravi Prakash Jha, Nitin Joseph, Farnaz Kalantar, Himal Kandel, Ibraheem M Karaye, Woldeteklehaymanot Dagne Kassahun, Imteyaz A Khan, Shaghayegh Khanmohammadi, Adnan Kisa, Farzad Kompani, Kewal Krishan, Iván Landires, Stephen S Lim, Preetam Bhalchandra Mahajan, Soleiman Mahjoub, Azeem Majeed, Bishnu P Marasini, Haftu Asmerom Meresa, Tomislav Mestrovic, Sonica Minhas, Awoke Misganaw, Ali H Mokdad, Lorenzo Monasta, Ghulam Mustafa, Tapas Sadasivan Nair, Sreenivas Narasimha Swamy, Hasan Nassereldine, Zuhair S Natto, Muhammad Naveed, Biswa Prakash Nayak, Jean Jacques Noubiap, Taylor Noyes, Chisom Adaobi Nri-ezedi, Vincent Ebuka Nwatah, Chimezie Igwegbe Nzoputam, Ogochukwu Janet Nzoputam, Osaretin Christabel Okonji, Adeyinka Omoniyi Onikan, Mayowa O Owolabi, Jay Patel, Siddhartha Pati, Shrikant Pawar, Ionela-Roxana Petcu, Frédéric B Piel, Ibrahim Qattea, Mehran Rahimi, Mosiur Rahman, Salman Rawaf, Elrashdy Moustafa Mohamed Redwan, Nazila Rezaei, Basema Saddik, Umar Saeed, Fatemeh Saheb Sharif-Askari, Abdallah M Samy, Austin E Schumacher, Elaheh Shaker, Adithi Shetty, Migbar Mekonnen Sibhat, Jasvinder A Singh, Muhammad Suleman, Dev Ram Sunuwar, Mindy D Szeto, Jacques JL Lukenze Tamuzi, Nathan Y Tat, Birhan Tsegaw Taye, Mohamad-Hani Temsah, Muhammad Umair, Sahel Valadan Tahbaz, Cong Wang, Nuwan Darshana Wickramasinghe, Arzu Yigit, Vahit Yiğit, Ismaeel Yunusa, Burhan Abdullah Zaman, Moein Zangiabadian, Peng Zheng, Simon I Hay, Mohsen Naghavi, Christopher J L Murray, Nicholas J Kassebaum |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 151 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 42 | 28% |
| United Kingdom | 13 | 9% |
| India | 5 | 3% |
| Spain | 5 | 3% |
| Poland | 3 | 2% |
| Canada | 3 | 2% |
| Nigeria | 2 | 1% |
| Ghana | 2 | 1% |
| Tanzania, United Republic of | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 17 | 11% |
| Unknown | 57 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 94 | 62% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 28 | 19% |
| Scientists | 21 | 14% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 8 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 356 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 356 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 33 | 9% |
| Unspecified | 24 | 7% |
| Student > Master | 24 | 7% |
| Researcher | 19 | 5% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 18 | 5% |
| Other | 55 | 15% |
| Unknown | 183 | 51% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 66 | 19% |
| Unspecified | 25 | 7% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 24 | 7% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 16 | 4% |
| Engineering | 8 | 2% |
| Other | 30 | 8% |
| Unknown | 187 | 53% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 550. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 April 2024.
All research outputs
#45,031
of 25,793,330 outputs
Outputs from The Lancet Haematology
#8
of 1,290 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,172
of 384,754 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Lancet Haematology
#1
of 55 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,793,330 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,290 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 384,754 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 55 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.