↓ Skip to main content

Global, regional, and national prevalence and mortality burden of sickle cell disease, 2000–2021: a systematic analysis from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2021

Overview of attention for article published in The Lancet Haematology, June 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#7 of 1,320)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
59 news outlets
blogs
5 blogs
twitter
193 X users
facebook
5 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
87 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
426 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Global, regional, and national prevalence and mortality burden of sickle cell disease, 2000–2021: a systematic analysis from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2021
Published in
The Lancet Haematology, June 2023
DOI 10.1016/s2352-3026(23)00118-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

GBD 2021 Sickle Cell Disease Collaborators, Azalea M Thomson, Theresa A McHugh, Assaf P Oron, Corey Teply, Nikhil Lonberg, Victor Vilchis Tella, Lauren B Wilner, Kia Fuller, Hailey Hagins, Richard Gyan Aboagye, Melka Biratu Aboye, Eman Abu-Gharbieh, Ahmed Abu-Zaid, Isaac Yeboah Addo, Bright Opoku Ahinkorah, Aqeel Ahmad, Saif Aldeen S AlRyalat, Hubert Amu, Aleksandr Y Aravkin, Judie Arulappan, Maha Moh'd Wahbi Atout, Ashish D Badiye, Sara Bagherieh, Maciej Banach, Morteza Banakar, Mainak Bardhan, Amadou Barrow, Deriba Abera Bedane, Isabela M Bensenor, Akshaya Srikanth Bhagavathula, Pankaj Bhardwaj, Prarthna V Bhardwaj, Ajay Nagesh Bhat, Zulfiqar A Bhutta, Mariah Malak Bilalaga, Jessica Devin Bishai, Saeid Bitaraf, Archith Boloor, Muhammad Hammad Butt, Vijay Kumar Chattu, Dinh-Toi Chu, Omid Dadras, Xiaochen Dai, Bardia Danaei, Anh Kim Dang, Fitsum Wolde Demisse, Meghnath Dhimal, Daniel Diaz, Shirin Djalalinia, Deepa Dongarwar, Muhammed Elhadi, Mohamed A Elmonem, Christopher Imokhuede Esezobor, Farshid Etaee, Oghenowede Eyawo, Adeniyi Francis Fagbamigbe, Ali Fatehizadeh, Lisa M Force, William M Gardner, Kazem Ghaffari, Paramjit Singh Gill, Mahaveer Golechha, Pouya Goleij, Vivek Kumar Gupta, Hamidreza Hasani, Treska S Hassan, Mohammed Bheser Hassen, Segun Emmanuel Ibitoye, Adalia I Ikiroma, Chidozie C D Iwu, Peter Bai James, Shubha Jayaram, Rime Jebai, Ravi Prakash Jha, Nitin Joseph, Farnaz Kalantar, Himal Kandel, Ibraheem M Karaye, Woldeteklehaymanot Dagne Kassahun, Imteyaz A Khan, Shaghayegh Khanmohammadi, Adnan Kisa, Farzad Kompani, Kewal Krishan, Iván Landires, Stephen S Lim, Preetam Bhalchandra Mahajan, Soleiman Mahjoub, Azeem Majeed, Bishnu P Marasini, Haftu Asmerom Meresa, Tomislav Mestrovic, Sonica Minhas, Awoke Misganaw, Ali H Mokdad, Lorenzo Monasta, Ghulam Mustafa, Tapas Sadasivan Nair, Sreenivas Narasimha Swamy, Hasan Nassereldine, Zuhair S Natto, Muhammad Naveed, Biswa Prakash Nayak, Jean Jacques Noubiap, Taylor Noyes, Chisom Adaobi Nri-ezedi, Vincent Ebuka Nwatah, Chimezie Igwegbe Nzoputam, Ogochukwu Janet Nzoputam, Osaretin Christabel Okonji, Adeyinka Omoniyi Onikan, Mayowa O Owolabi, Jay Patel, Siddhartha Pati, Shrikant Pawar, Ionela-Roxana Petcu, Frédéric B Piel, Ibrahim Qattea, Mehran Rahimi, Mosiur Rahman, Salman Rawaf, Elrashdy Moustafa Mohamed Redwan, Nazila Rezaei, Basema Saddik, Umar Saeed, Fatemeh Saheb Sharif-Askari, Abdallah M Samy, Austin E Schumacher, Elaheh Shaker, Adithi Shetty, Migbar Mekonnen Sibhat, Jasvinder A Singh, Muhammad Suleman, Dev Ram Sunuwar, Mindy D Szeto, Jacques JL Lukenze Tamuzi, Nathan Y Tat, Birhan Tsegaw Taye, Mohamad-Hani Temsah, Muhammad Umair, Sahel Valadan Tahbaz, Cong Wang, Nuwan Darshana Wickramasinghe, Arzu Yigit, Vahit Yiğit, Ismaeel Yunusa, Burhan Abdullah Zaman, Moein Zangiabadian, Peng Zheng, Simon I Hay, Mohsen Naghavi, Christopher J L Murray, Nicholas J Kassebaum

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 193 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 426 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 426 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 38 9%
Student > Master 32 8%
Student > Bachelor 32 8%
Researcher 25 6%
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 5%
Other 68 16%
Unknown 211 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 79 19%
Unspecified 43 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 26 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 18 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 8 2%
Other 36 8%
Unknown 216 51%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 590. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 June 2024.
All research outputs
#40,811
of 26,160,558 outputs
Outputs from The Lancet Haematology
#7
of 1,320 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,052
of 388,675 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Lancet Haematology
#1
of 55 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,160,558 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,320 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 28.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 388,675 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 55 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.