↓ Skip to main content

Systematic Review to Inform a World Health Organization (WHO) Clinical Practice Guideline: Benefits and Harms of Structured Exercise Programs for Chronic Primary Low Back Pain in Adults

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation, November 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#50 of 665)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
37 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
20 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Systematic Review to Inform a World Health Organization (WHO) Clinical Practice Guideline: Benefits and Harms of Structured Exercise Programs for Chronic Primary Low Back Pain in Adults
Published in
Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation, November 2023
DOI 10.1007/s10926-023-10124-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Leslie Verville, Rachel Ogilvie, Cesar A. Hincapié, Danielle Southerst, Hainan Yu, André Bussières, Douglas P. Gross, Paulo Pereira, Silvano Mior, Andrea C. Tricco, Christine Cedraschi, Ginny Brunton, Margareta Nordin, Gaelan Connell, Jessica J. Wong, Heather M. Shearer, Joyce G. B. Lee, Dan Wang, Jill A. Hayden, Carol Cancelliere

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 37 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 20 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 4 20%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 10%
Student > Bachelor 1 5%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 5%
Student > Master 1 5%
Other 1 5%
Unknown 10 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 4 20%
Environmental Science 1 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 5%
Other 1 5%
Unknown 11 55%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 December 2023.
All research outputs
#1,811,614
of 25,401,381 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation
#50
of 665 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,464
of 351,995 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation
#2
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,401,381 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 665 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 351,995 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.