The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 36 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Systematic Review to Inform a World Health Organization (WHO) Clinical Practice Guideline: Benefits and Harms of Structured Exercise Programs for Chronic Primary Low Back Pain in Adults
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation, November 2023
|
DOI | 10.1007/s10926-023-10124-4 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Leslie Verville, Rachel Ogilvie, Cesar A. Hincapié, Danielle Southerst, Hainan Yu, André Bussières, Douglas P. Gross, Paulo Pereira, Silvano Mior, Andrea C. Tricco, Christine Cedraschi, Ginny Brunton, Margareta Nordin, Gaelan Connell, Jessica J. Wong, Heather M. Shearer, Joyce G. B. Lee, Dan Wang, Jill A. Hayden, Carol Cancelliere |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
India | 4 | 11% |
United Kingdom | 2 | 6% |
Switzerland | 1 | 3% |
Russia | 1 | 3% |
United States | 1 | 3% |
Singapore | 1 | 3% |
Italy | 1 | 3% |
Mexico | 1 | 3% |
Indonesia | 1 | 3% |
Other | 4 | 11% |
Unknown | 19 | 53% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 29 | 81% |
Scientists | 5 | 14% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 3% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 46 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 46 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unspecified | 6 | 13% |
Other | 5 | 11% |
Student > Master | 5 | 11% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 4% |
Student > Bachelor | 1 | 2% |
Other | 3 | 7% |
Unknown | 24 | 52% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unspecified | 6 | 13% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 13% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 9% |
Environmental Science | 1 | 2% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 2% |
Other | 3 | 7% |
Unknown | 25 | 54% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 December 2023.
All research outputs
#2,026,621
of 26,784,510 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation
#55
of 703 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,067
of 405,091 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation
#1
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,784,510 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 703 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 405,091 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.