You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
Title |
ALK‐rearranged CD30‐positive poorly differentiated lung adenocarcinoma, mimicking anaplastic large‐cell lymphoma
|
---|---|
Published in |
Histopathology, November 2023
|
DOI | 10.1111/his.15105 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Giby V George, Danielle S Wallace, Ying Wang, John Carney, Murad Elsadawi, W Richard Burack, Andrew G Evans, Paul M Barr, Moises J Velez, Siba El Hussein |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 63 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 14 | 22% |
Spain | 8 | 13% |
Mexico | 2 | 3% |
India | 2 | 3% |
Hong Kong | 1 | 2% |
Turkey | 1 | 2% |
Italy | 1 | 2% |
Canada | 1 | 2% |
Comoros | 1 | 2% |
Other | 4 | 6% |
Unknown | 28 | 44% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 44 | 70% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 10 | 16% |
Scientists | 9 | 14% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 42. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 January 2024.
All research outputs
#976,784
of 25,378,799 outputs
Outputs from Histopathology
#33
of 3,512 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,152
of 345,888 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Histopathology
#1
of 54 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,378,799 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,512 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 345,888 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 54 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.