↓ Skip to main content

ALK‐rearranged CD30‐positive poorly differentiated lung adenocarcinoma, mimicking anaplastic large‐cell lymphoma

Overview of attention for article published in Histopathology, November 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#28 of 3,570)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
66 X users
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
ALK‐rearranged CD30‐positive poorly differentiated lung adenocarcinoma, mimicking anaplastic large‐cell lymphoma
Published in
Histopathology, November 2023
DOI 10.1111/his.15105
Pubmed ID
Authors

Giby V George, Danielle S Wallace, Ying Wang, John Carney, Murad Elsadawi, W Richard Burack, Andrew G Evans, Paul M Barr, Moises J Velez, Siba El Hussein

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 66 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 44. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 June 2024.
All research outputs
#977,249
of 26,154,612 outputs
Outputs from Histopathology
#28
of 3,570 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,315
of 381,598 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Histopathology
#1
of 53 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,154,612 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,570 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 381,598 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 53 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.