You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Effect of multivitamin-mineral supplementation versus placebo on cognitive function: results from the clinic subcohort of the COcoa Supplement and Multivitamin Outcomes Study (COSMOS) randomized clinical trial and meta-analysis of 3 cognitive studies within COSMOS
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, January 2024
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.ajcnut.2023.12.011 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Chirag M Vyas, JoAnn E Manson, Howard D Sesso, Nancy R Cook, Pamela M Rist, Alison Weinberg, M Vinayaga Moorthy, Laura D Baker, Mark A Espeland, Lok-Kin Yeung, Adam M Brickman, Olivia I Okereke |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 136 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 31 | 23% |
| United Kingdom | 4 | 3% |
| Australia | 3 | 2% |
| Canada | 3 | 2% |
| Turkey | 3 | 2% |
| Mexico | 3 | 2% |
| Finland | 2 | 1% |
| Japan | 2 | 1% |
| Chile | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 19 | 14% |
| Unknown | 64 | 47% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 90 | 66% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 30 | 22% |
| Scientists | 13 | 10% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 21 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 21 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 5 | 24% |
| Researcher | 5 | 24% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 1 | 5% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 9 | 43% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 24% |
| Neuroscience | 3 | 14% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 10% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 5% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 8 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1558. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 May 2024.
All research outputs
#7,506
of 25,863,888 outputs
Outputs from American Journal of Clinical Nutrition
#14
of 12,688 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#153
of 355,424 outputs
Outputs of similar age from American Journal of Clinical Nutrition
#1
of 97 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,863,888 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,688 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 355,424 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 97 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.