You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
On the genetic basis of tail-loss evolution in humans and apes
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature, February 2024
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41586-024-07095-8 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Bo Xia, Weimin Zhang, Guisheng Zhao, Xinru Zhang, Jiangshan Bai, Ran Brosh, Aleksandra Wudzinska, Emily Huang, Hannah Ashe, Gwen Ellis, Maayan Pour, Yu Zhao, Camila Coelho, Yinan Zhu, Alexander Miller, Jeremy S. Dasen, Matthew T. Maurano, Sang Y. Kim, Jef D. Boeke, Itai Yanai |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2,615 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 432 | 17% |
| United Kingdom | 119 | 5% |
| Germany | 79 | 3% |
| Spain | 68 | 3% |
| Japan | 67 | 3% |
| Thailand | 65 | 2% |
| France | 62 | 2% |
| India | 53 | 2% |
| Canada | 45 | 2% |
| Other | 410 | 16% |
| Unknown | 1215 | 46% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1610 | 62% |
| Scientists | 939 | 36% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 35 | 1% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 31 | 1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 203 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 203 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 34 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 27 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 18 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 15 | 7% |
| Professor | 11 | 5% |
| Other | 46 | 23% |
| Unknown | 52 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 60 | 30% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 36 | 18% |
| Unspecified | 11 | 5% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 8 | 4% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 7 | 3% |
| Other | 21 | 10% |
| Unknown | 60 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3296. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 April 2024.
All research outputs
#1,861
of 25,806,080 outputs
Outputs from Nature
#189
of 98,831 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27
of 332,342 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature
#2
of 1,086 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,806,080 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 98,831 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 102.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 332,342 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,086 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.