↓ Skip to main content

On the genetic basis of tail-loss evolution in humans and apes

Overview of attention for article published in Nature, February 2024
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
251 news outlets
blogs
19 blogs
twitter
2615 X users
facebook
6 Facebook pages
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages
reddit
1 Redditor
video
3 YouTube creators

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
211 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
On the genetic basis of tail-loss evolution in humans and apes
Published in
Nature, February 2024
DOI 10.1038/s41586-024-07095-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Bo Xia, Weimin Zhang, Guisheng Zhao, Xinru Zhang, Jiangshan Bai, Ran Brosh, Aleksandra Wudzinska, Emily Huang, Hannah Ashe, Gwen Ellis, Maayan Pour, Yu Zhao, Camila Coelho, Yinan Zhu, Alexander Miller, Jeremy S. Dasen, Matthew T. Maurano, Sang Y. Kim, Jef D. Boeke, Itai Yanai

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2,615 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 211 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 211 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 34 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 28 13%
Student > Bachelor 18 9%
Student > Master 15 7%
Other 11 5%
Other 46 22%
Unknown 59 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 62 29%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 37 18%
Medicine and Dentistry 8 4%
Immunology and Microbiology 7 3%
Unspecified 7 3%
Other 21 10%
Unknown 69 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3296. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 May 2024.
All research outputs
#1,872
of 25,891,484 outputs
Outputs from Nature
#189
of 99,024 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28
of 337,473 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature
#2
of 1,085 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,891,484 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 99,024 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 102.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 337,473 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,085 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.