You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Microplastics and Nanoplastics in Atheromas and Cardiovascular Events
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
New England Journal of Medicine, March 2024
|
| DOI | 10.1056/nejmoa2309822 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Raffaele Marfella, Francesco Prattichizzo, Celestino Sardu, Gianluca Fulgenzi, Laura Graciotti, Tatiana Spadoni, Nunzia D'Onofrio, Lucia Scisciola, Rosalba La Grotta, Chiara Frigé, Valeria Pellegrini, Maurizio Municinò, Mario Siniscalchi, Fabio Spinetti, Gennaro Vigliotti, Carmine Vecchione, Albino Carrizzo, Giulio Accarino, Antonio Squillante, Giuseppe Spaziano, Davida Mirra, Renata Esposito, Simona Altieri, Giovanni Falco, Angelo Fenti, Simona Galoppo, Silvana Canzano, Ferdinando C Sasso, Giulia Matacchione, Fabiola Olivieri, Franca Ferraraccio, Iacopo Panarese, Pasquale Paolisso, Emanuele Barbato, Carmine Lubritto, Maria L Balestrieri, Ciro Mauro, Augusto E Caballero, Sanjay Rajagopalan, Antonio Ceriello, Bruno D'Agostino, Pasquale Iovino, Giuseppe Paolisso |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4,974 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 800 | 16% |
| Spain | 228 | 5% |
| United Kingdom | 156 | 3% |
| Peru | 123 | 2% |
| Japan | 119 | 2% |
| Canada | 105 | 2% |
| Germany | 91 | 2% |
| Mexico | 73 | 1% |
| Australia | 52 | 1% |
| Other | 657 | 13% |
| Unknown | 2570 | 52% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4080 | 82% |
| Scientists | 434 | 9% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 410 | 8% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 50 | 1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 205 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 205 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 34 | 17% |
| Researcher | 28 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 23 | 11% |
| Other | 21 | 10% |
| Professor | 19 | 9% |
| Other | 37 | 18% |
| Unknown | 43 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 37 | 18% |
| Unspecified | 34 | 17% |
| Environmental Science | 17 | 8% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 15 | 7% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 14 | 7% |
| Other | 47 | 23% |
| Unknown | 41 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5101. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 April 2024.
All research outputs
#794
of 25,806,080 outputs
Outputs from New England Journal of Medicine
#76
of 32,690 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10
of 328,808 outputs
Outputs of similar age from New England Journal of Medicine
#1
of 258 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,806,080 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 32,690 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 122.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 328,808 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 258 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.