↓ Skip to main content

Microplastics and Nanoplastics in Atheromas and Cardiovascular Events

Overview of attention for article published in New England Journal of Medicine, March 2024
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
84 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
299 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Microplastics and Nanoplastics in Atheromas and Cardiovascular Events
Published in
New England Journal of Medicine, March 2024
DOI 10.1056/nejmoa2309822
Pubmed ID
Authors

Raffaele Marfella, Francesco Prattichizzo, Celestino Sardu, Gianluca Fulgenzi, Laura Graciotti, Tatiana Spadoni, Nunzia D'Onofrio, Lucia Scisciola, Rosalba La Grotta, Chiara Frigé, Valeria Pellegrini, Maurizio Municinò, Mario Siniscalchi, Fabio Spinetti, Gennaro Vigliotti, Carmine Vecchione, Albino Carrizzo, Giulio Accarino, Antonio Squillante, Giuseppe Spaziano, Davida Mirra, Renata Esposito, Simona Altieri, Giovanni Falco, Angelo Fenti, Simona Galoppo, Silvana Canzano, Ferdinando C Sasso, Giulia Matacchione, Fabiola Olivieri, Franca Ferraraccio, Iacopo Panarese, Pasquale Paolisso, Emanuele Barbato, Carmine Lubritto, Maria L Balestrieri, Ciro Mauro, Augusto E Caballero, Sanjay Rajagopalan, Antonio Ceriello, Bruno D'Agostino, Pasquale Iovino, Giuseppe Paolisso

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5,014 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 299 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 299 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 40 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 36 12%
Unspecified 28 9%
Other 22 7%
Professor 22 7%
Other 60 20%
Unknown 91 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 48 16%
Unspecified 30 10%
Environmental Science 25 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 22 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 15 5%
Other 69 23%
Unknown 90 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5959. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 July 2024.
All research outputs
#587
of 26,377,159 outputs
Outputs from New England Journal of Medicine
#58
of 33,025 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7
of 355,157 outputs
Outputs of similar age from New England Journal of Medicine
#1
of 258 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,377,159 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 33,025 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 124.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 355,157 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 258 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.