↓ Skip to main content

Large-scale phenotyping of patients with long COVID post-hospitalization reveals mechanistic subtypes of disease

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Immunology, April 2024
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#4 of 4,242)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
189 news outlets
blogs
4 blogs
twitter
1701 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
reddit
1 Redditor
video
1 YouTube creator

Readers on

mendeley
38 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Large-scale phenotyping of patients with long COVID post-hospitalization reveals mechanistic subtypes of disease
Published in
Nature Immunology, April 2024
DOI 10.1038/s41590-024-01778-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Felicity Liew, Claudia Efstathiou, Sara Fontanella, Matthew Richardson, Ruth Saunders, Dawid Swieboda, Jasmin K. Sidhu, Stephanie Ascough, Shona C. Moore, Noura Mohamed, Jose Nunag, Clara King, Olivia C. Leavy, Omer Elneima, Hamish J. C. McAuley, Aarti Shikotra, Amisha Singapuri, Marco Sereno, Victoria C. Harris, Linzy Houchen-Wolloff, Neil J. Greening, Nazir I. Lone, Matthew Thorpe, A. A. Roger Thompson, Sarah L. Rowland-Jones, Annemarie B. Docherty, James D. Chalmers, Ling-Pei Ho, Alexander Horsley, Betty Raman, Krisnah Poinasamy, Michael Marks, Onn Min Kon, Luke S. Howard, Daniel G. Wootton, Jennifer K. Quint, Thushan I. de Silva, Antonia Ho, Christopher Chiu, Ewen M. Harrison, William Greenhalf, J. Kenneth Baillie, Malcolm G. Semple, Lance Turtle, Rachael A. Evans, Louise V. Wain, Christopher Brightling, Ryan S. Thwaites, Peter J. M. Openshaw

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 1,701 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 38 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 38 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 20 53%
Unspecified 9 24%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 8%
Professor 2 5%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 3%
Other 3 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 17 45%
Unspecified 9 24%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 11%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 5%
Other 3 8%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2167. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 April 2024.
All research outputs
#4,079
of 25,816,430 outputs
Outputs from Nature Immunology
#4
of 4,242 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#35
of 230,629 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Immunology
#1
of 62 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,816,430 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,242 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 36.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 230,629 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 62 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.