The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 1,706 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Large-scale phenotyping of patients with long COVID post-hospitalization reveals mechanistic subtypes of disease
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature Immunology, April 2024
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41590-024-01778-0 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Felicity Liew, Claudia Efstathiou, Sara Fontanella, Matthew Richardson, Ruth Saunders, Dawid Swieboda, Jasmin K. Sidhu, Stephanie Ascough, Shona C. Moore, Noura Mohamed, Jose Nunag, Clara King, Olivia C. Leavy, Omer Elneima, Hamish J. C. McAuley, Aarti Shikotra, Amisha Singapuri, Marco Sereno, Victoria C. Harris, Linzy Houchen-Wolloff, Neil J. Greening, Nazir I. Lone, Matthew Thorpe, A. A. Roger Thompson, Sarah L. Rowland-Jones, Annemarie B. Docherty, James D. Chalmers, Ling-Pei Ho, Alexander Horsley, Betty Raman, Krisnah Poinasamy, Michael Marks, Onn Min Kon, Luke S. Howard, Daniel G. Wootton, Jennifer K. Quint, Thushan I. de Silva, Antonia Ho, Christopher Chiu, Ewen M. Harrison, William Greenhalf, J. Kenneth Baillie, Malcolm G. Semple, Lance Turtle, Rachael A. Evans, Louise V. Wain, Christopher Brightling, Ryan S. Thwaites, Peter J. M. Openshaw |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 32 | 2% |
| Mexico | 32 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 27 | 2% |
| France | 14 | <1% |
| Spain | 7 | <1% |
| Japan | 5 | <1% |
| Canada | 3 | <1% |
| Uruguay | 3 | <1% |
| Norway | 3 | <1% |
| Other | 28 | 2% |
| Unknown | 1552 | 91% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1440 | 84% |
| Scientists | 139 | 8% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 110 | 6% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 17 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 59 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 59 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 17 | 29% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 12% |
| Other | 5 | 8% |
| Professor | 5 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 7 | 12% |
| Unknown | 15 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 10 | 17% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 9 | 15% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 9 | 15% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 7% |
| Engineering | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 8 | 14% |
| Unknown | 16 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2204. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 July 2024.
All research outputs
#4,067
of 26,374,559 outputs
Outputs from Nature Immunology
#4
of 4,319 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#64
of 347,997 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Immunology
#1
of 75 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,374,559 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,319 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 37.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 347,997 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 75 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.