↓ Skip to main content

Mass media interventions for reducing mental health‐related stigma

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (86th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
policy
7 policy sources
twitter
24 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Readers on

mendeley
1083 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Mass media interventions for reducing mental health‐related stigma
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd009453.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Mental health-related stigma is widespread and has major adverse effects on the lives of people with mental health problems. Its two major components are discrimination (being treated unfairly) and prejudice (stigmatising attitudes). Anti-stigma initiatives often include mass media interventions, and such interventions can be expensive. It is important to know if mass media interventions are effective.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 24 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,083 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 4 <1%
United Kingdom 4 <1%
Germany 3 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Singapore 1 <1%
Puerto Rico 1 <1%
Malaysia 1 <1%
Malawi 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Other 2 <1%
Unknown 1064 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 178 16%
Researcher 128 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 119 11%
Student > Bachelor 113 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 58 5%
Other 164 15%
Unknown 323 30%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 184 17%
Medicine and Dentistry 177 16%
Social Sciences 119 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 114 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 16 1%
Other 112 10%
Unknown 361 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 53. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 July 2026.
All research outputs
#1,008,043
of 34,357,314 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,794
of 14,573 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,824
of 242,571 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#35
of 254 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,357,314 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,573 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 242,571 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 254 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.