↓ Skip to main content

Transition from turbulent to coherent flows in confined three-dimensional active fluids

Overview of attention for article published in Science, March 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

news
22 news outlets
blogs
4 blogs
twitter
53 X users
patent
9 patents
facebook
4 Facebook pages
googleplus
23 Google+ users
reddit
3 Redditors

Readers on

mendeley
288 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Transition from turbulent to coherent flows in confined three-dimensional active fluids
Published in
Science, March 2017
DOI 10.1126/science.aal1979
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Transport of fluid through a pipe is essential for the operation of macroscale machines and microfluidic devices. Conventional fluids only flow in response to external pressure. We demonstrate that an active isotropic fluid, composed of microtubules and molecular motors, autonomously flows through meter-long three-dimensional channels. We establish control over the magnitude, velocity profile, and direction of the self-organized flows and correlate these to the structure of the extensile microtubule bundles. The inherently three-dimensional transition from bulk-turbulent to confined-coherent flows occurs concomitantly with a transition in the bundle orientational order near the surface and is controlled by a scale-invariant criterion related to the channel profile. The nonequilibrium transition of confined isotropic active fluids can be used to engineer self-organized soft machines.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 53 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 288 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Japan 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Austria 1 <1%
Unknown 284 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 75 26%
Researcher 50 17%
Student > Master 29 10%
Professor 21 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 17 6%
Other 40 14%
Unknown 56 19%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Physics and Astronomy 105 36%
Engineering 41 14%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 17 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 4%
Chemical Engineering 12 4%
Other 36 13%
Unknown 65 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 231. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 May 2025.
All research outputs
#202,477
of 33,148,248 outputs
Outputs from Science
#5,551
of 93,129 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,592
of 344,931 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science
#106
of 1,226 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 33,148,248 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 93,129 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 65.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 344,931 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,226 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.