↓ Skip to main content

User‐held personalised information for routine care of people with severe mental illness

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (80th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
280 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
User‐held personalised information for routine care of people with severe mental illness
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd001711.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

It is important to seek cost-effective methods of improving the care and outcome of those with serious mental illnesses. User-held records, where the person with the illness holds all or some personal information relating to the course and care of their illness, are now the norm in some clinical settings. Their value for those with severe mental illnesses is unknown.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 280 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
France 1 <1%
Unknown 279 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 35 13%
Student > Master 33 12%
Student > Bachelor 32 11%
Researcher 32 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 20 7%
Other 43 15%
Unknown 85 30%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 66 24%
Psychology 41 15%
Nursing and Health Professions 39 14%
Social Sciences 11 4%
Computer Science 6 2%
Other 24 9%
Unknown 93 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 June 2016.
All research outputs
#6,400,693
of 34,364,397 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8,645
of 14,575 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#48,780
of 255,347 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#151
of 224 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,364,397 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,575 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.6. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 255,347 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 224 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.