↓ Skip to main content

RETRACTED ARTICLE: DNA barcoding detects contamination and substitution in North American herbal products

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medicine, October 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#30 of 5,226)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
88 news outlets
blogs
24 blogs
twitter
303 X users
patent
4 patents
peer_reviews
1 peer review site
facebook
109 Facebook pages
wikipedia
9 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
30 Google+ users
reddit
61 Redditors
video
8 YouTube creators
podcasts
3 podcasts

Readers on

mendeley
612 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
RETRACTED ARTICLE: DNA barcoding detects contamination and substitution in North American herbal products
Published in
BMC Medicine, October 2013
DOI 10.1186/1741-7015-11-222
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Herbal products available to consumers in the marketplace may be contaminated or substituted with alternative plant species and fillers that are not listed on the labels. According to the World Health Organization, the adulteration of herbal products is a threat to consumer safety. Our research aimed to investigate herbal product integrity and authenticity with the goal of protecting consumers from health risks associated with product substitution and contamination.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 303 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 612 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 13 2%
Canada 4 <1%
India 3 <1%
Slovenia 1 <1%
Philippines 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Greece 1 <1%
Other 4 <1%
Unknown 582 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 99 16%
Student > Master 80 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 77 13%
Student > Bachelor 70 11%
Student > Postgraduate 32 5%
Other 128 21%
Unknown 126 21%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 190 31%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 79 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 62 10%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 38 6%
Chemistry 23 4%
Other 79 13%
Unknown 141 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1125. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 May 2026.
All research outputs
#16,439
of 34,351,737 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medicine
#30
of 5,226 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#66
of 258,773 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medicine
#1
of 62 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,351,737 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,226 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 45.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 258,773 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 62 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.