↓ Skip to main content

DNA barcoding detects contamination and substitution in North American herbal products.

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medicine, October 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#3 of 1,582)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
59 news outlets
blogs
19 blogs
twitter
432 tweeters
peer_reviews
1 peer review site
facebook
108 Facebook pages
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
29 Google+ users
reddit
3 Redditors
video
2 video uploaders

Readers on

mendeley
288 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
DNA barcoding detects contamination and substitution in North American herbal products.
Published in
BMC Medicine, October 2013
DOI 10.1186/1741-7015-11-222
Pubmed ID
Authors

Newmaster SG, Grguric M, Shanmughanandhan D, Ramalingam S, Ragupathy S, Steven G Newmaster, Meghan Grguric, Dhivya Shanmughanandhan, Sathishkumar Ramalingam, Subramanyam Ragupathy

Abstract

Herbal products available to consumers in the marketplace may be contaminated or substituted with alternative plant species and fillers that are not listed on the labels. According to the World Health Organization, the adulteration of herbal products is a threat to consumer safety. Our research aimed to investigate herbal product integrity and authenticity with the goal of protecting consumers from health risks associated with product substitution and contamination.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 432 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 288 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 18 6%
Canada 6 2%
India 2 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Slovenia 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Other 3 1%
Unknown 253 88%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 73 25%
Student > Master 45 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 45 16%
Student > Bachelor 42 15%
Professor > Associate Professor 20 7%
Other 63 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 151 52%
Medicine and Dentistry 48 17%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 25 9%
Chemistry 14 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 7 2%
Other 43 15%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1001. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 April 2017.
All research outputs
#1,587
of 7,870,841 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medicine
#3
of 1,582 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28
of 142,021 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medicine
#1
of 57 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 7,870,841 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,582 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 142,021 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 57 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.