↓ Skip to main content

Hyperdopaminergia and NMDA Receptor Hypofunction Disrupt Neural Phase Signaling

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Neuroscience, June 2009
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
reddit
1 Redditor

Citations

dimensions_citation
87 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
150 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Hyperdopaminergia and NMDA Receptor Hypofunction Disrupt Neural Phase Signaling
Published in
Journal of Neuroscience, June 2009
DOI 10.1523/jneurosci.1773-09.2009
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kafui Dzirasa, Amy J. Ramsey, Daniel Yasumasa Takahashi, Jennifer Stapleton, Juan M. Potes, Jamila K. Williams, Raul R. Gainetdinov, Koichi Sameshima, Marc G. Caron, Miguel A. L. Nicolelis

Abstract

Neural phase signaling has gained attention as a putative coding mechanism through which the brain binds the activity of neurons across distributed brain areas to generate thoughts, percepts, and behaviors. Neural phase signaling has been shown to play a role in various cognitive processes, and it has been suggested that altered phase signaling may play a role in mediating the cognitive deficits observed across neuropsychiatric illness. Here, we investigated neural phase signaling in two mouse models of cognitive dysfunction: mice with genetically induced hyperdopaminergia [dopamine transporter knock-out (DAT-KO) mice] and mice with genetically induced NMDA receptor hypofunction [NMDA receptor subunit-1 knockdown (NR1-KD) mice]. Cognitive function in these mice was assessed using a radial-arm maze task, and local field potentials were recorded from dorsal hippocampus and prefrontal cortex as DAT-KO mice, NR1-KD mice, and their littermate controls engaged in behavioral exploration. Our results demonstrate that both DAT-KO and NR1-KD mice display deficits in spatial cognitive performance. Moreover, we show that persistent hyperdopaminergia alters interstructural phase signaling, whereas NMDA receptor hypofunction alters interstructural and intrastructural phase signaling. These results demonstrate that dopamine and NMDA receptor dependent glutamate signaling play a critical role in coordinating neural phase signaling, and encourage further studies to investigate the role that deficits in phase signaling play in mediating cognitive dysfunction.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 150 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 7 5%
France 2 1%
Australia 2 1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 133 89%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 39 26%
Student > Ph. D. Student 35 23%
Student > Master 15 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 12 8%
Student > Bachelor 8 5%
Other 24 16%
Unknown 17 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 51 34%
Neuroscience 34 23%
Medicine and Dentistry 18 12%
Psychology 10 7%
Engineering 4 3%
Other 8 5%
Unknown 25 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 January 2016.
All research outputs
#19,017,658
of 23,577,654 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Neuroscience
#21,235
of 23,491 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#104,040
of 112,936 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Neuroscience
#175
of 195 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,654 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 23,491 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.4. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 112,936 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 195 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.